Colony-Wars Forum

  • May 18, 2012, 04:34:52 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Edipus is up and ready to begin next friday.  Cadmus finishes this coming sunday.

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: A question winawer  (Read 88 times)

TheMaster2007

  • Guest
A question winawer
« on: June 05, 2007, 11:35:37 AM »

Can the minimum amount of an actual group (50 units) be lowered?
Logged

sickbailey

  • Guest
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2007, 12:03:37 PM »

simply put, no.
Logged

TheMaster2007

  • Guest
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2007, 12:04:49 PM »

how come?
Logged

sickbailey

  • Guest
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2007, 12:16:28 PM »

its bin that way for 5 years for a reason.
You seem to be asking for all the minimum requirements to be lowered, while a lot of the other players seem in favour of trying to make things a little longer/harder.
Logged

TheMaster2007

  • Guest
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2007, 12:18:25 PM »

oh right. Soz
Logged

Ploppyplop

  • Guest
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2007, 03:04:39 PM »

as it is, 50 hawks is nothing...

Imagine if people just started sending a single hawk at each other while they were offline... :P
Logged

Winawer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Reputation: 1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 407
    • View Profile
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2007, 03:12:49 PM »

its bin that way for 5 years for a reason.

Hmm... The reason being?

Anyways,

1) This isn't a bug, this is a suggestion

and

2) The minimum of 50 units will stay in place for round 2.
Logged

sickbailey

  • Guest
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2007, 03:28:54 PM »

I thought I'd already moved this lol, my bad.

The reason being is that its overly annoying to defend against fleets as futile as something like 10 hawks. It's already a hassle defending against 50 hawks. If I had my way it would be a 1k unit minimum... ooo the possibilities...
Logged

Winawer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Reputation: 1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 407
    • View Profile
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2007, 03:31:17 PM »

1k seems overkill. I'm thinking about removing the cap and bringing back carriers next round.

You know the original reason for the 50 unit minimum?
Logged

sickbailey

  • Guest
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2007, 03:38:51 PM »

Memory can't.... fail... me... now...  >:(

Carriers do sound familiar but from a loooong time ago. 1k is slightly overkill, but it ensures that even cowards can have their units culled.
Logged

Winawer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Reputation: 1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 407
    • View Profile
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2007, 03:54:07 PM »

"Superhawk bug" ring a bell?
Logged

Ploppyplop

  • Guest
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2007, 05:24:46 PM »

Win, not everyone has ridiculously perfect CW-related memories like you... :P

Carriers could be interesting. I joined just after they were removed, along with a couple of other ships... the 'worm' or something? Might have just made that one up.
Logged

Winawer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Reputation: 1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 407
    • View Profile
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2007, 05:29:15 PM »

Yeah, there was a worm. Targeted lurkers.
Logged

Zhou_tai

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Reputation: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 243
  • WILL COME BACK SOON!!!!!!!
    • MSN Messenger - dflores_2020@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2007, 04:27:16 AM »

i remember Win. carriers were the units that brough back the stolin meteors or was it astroids correct
Logged

sickbailey

  • Guest
Re: A question winawer
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2007, 07:30:00 AM »

"Superhawk bug" ring a bell?

the bells ringing, but the lights aren't going off.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2